|
Keynes: The Return of the Master |  | Author: Robert Skidelsky Publisher: PublicAffairs Category: Book
List Price: $25.95 Buy New: $8.08 as of 3/20/2010 14:54 CDT details You Save: $17.87 (69%)
New (28) Used (24) from $6.97
Seller: ebooksweb* Rating: 19 reviews Sales Rank: 28547
Media: Hardcover Pages: 240 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1 Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.3 x 1
ISBN: 1586488279 Dewey Decimal Number: 330.156 EAN: 9781586488277 ASIN: 1586488279
Publication Date: September 14, 2009 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | ISBN13: 9781586488277 | | • | Condition: NEW | | • | Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark. |
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The ideas of John Maynard Keynes have never been more timely. No one has bettered Keynes's description of the psychology of investors during a financial crisis: ‘The practice of calmness and immobility, of certainty and security, suddenly breaks down. New fears and hopes will, without warning, take charge of human conduct… the market will be subject to waves of optimistic and pessimistic sentiment.' Keynes's preeminent biographer, Robert Skidelsky, Emeritus Professor of Political Economy at the University of Warwick, brilliantly synthesizes from Keynes's career and life the aspects of his thinking that apply most directly to the world we currently live in. In so doing, Skidelsky shows that Keynes's mixture of pragmatism and realism – which distinguished his thinking from the neo-classical or Chicago school of economics that has been the dominant influence since the Thatcher-Reagan era and which made possible the raw market capitalism that created the current global financial crisis – is more pertinent and applicable than ever. Crucially Keynes offers nervous capitalists – and Keynes never wavered in his belief in the capitalist system – a positive answer to the question we now face: When unbridled capitalism falters, is there an alternative? "In the long run," as Keynes famously said, "we are all dead". We may not have time to wait for the perfect theoretical operation of capital as the neo-classicists insist will happen eventually. In the meantime, we have Keynes: more supple, more human and more magnificently real than ever.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 19
Suggestive of Simon's "Bounded Rationality" February 21, 2010 Thomas J. Hickey (River Forest, IL USA) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Not surprisingly the recent world financial crisis has spawned a surge of books. Robert Skidelsky's book is more insightful than most. He is Professor Emeritus of political economy at the University of Warwick, England, and has previously written a three-volume biography of Keynes.
His book views the crisis through the spectacles of Keynesian economics. It manifests the author's considerable erudition in history of economics, and shows much refreshingly independent thought. Skidelsky's expressed agenda is the reform of economics and the teaching of economics.
Skidelsky maintains that economics has given a poor account of origins of the recent financial crisis, because there is something essentially incompatible between the economist's view of individual rationality and the systemic financial collapse. His chief argument is that underlying the escalating succession of recent financial crises there is a failure of economics to take uncertainty seriously and to cover up this neglect by means of sophisticated mathematics and statistics including econometrics.
Contrary to rationality in which all risks can be correctly priced such that financial markets are optimally self-regulating, economic choices are governed by conventional rather than rational expectations. Conventional expectations involve irreducible uncertainty with its "black swans" - bubbles inflated by positive feedback followed by collapse.
Skidelsky never references Nobel laureate economist and political scientist Herbert Simon. But his view of Keynes is in certain respects suggestive of Simon's thesis of bounded rationality. Like Simon, Skidelsky rejects the now discredited rational-expectations and efficient-market theses of the "New Classical" economics, which he says is also assumed by the "New Keynesians", who are not faithful to Keynes' thought. For more on Simon see his book Models of Bounded Rationality and his "Economic Rationality" in his book Sciences of the Artificial, where Simon discusses price bubbles.
Also google my web site, History of Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Science, and see especially BOOK VIII, pp. 52-54.
Game, Set and Match: A Bloomsbury Economist Revived February 20, 2010 B. Oza (CA, USA) JOHN Maynard Keynes reigns again at the centre of economic fashion. As finance capitalism has faltered, banks have collapsed and economies plunged into recession, government intervention and "stimulus packages" have roared back into vogue. Financial deregulation and efficient markets theory - the reigning ideas of the past 20 years - have demonstrably failed. "Big government," declared the ultra-Keynesian US commentator Paul Krugman recently, "has saved us."1
There could not be a better champion for the "Return of Keynes" thesis than economist Robert Skidelsky, author of a three-volume biography and high priest and keeper of his legacy.
The Return Of The Master is the noteworthy subtitle. It is a comprehensive account of the debacle that we were assured could never recur, and it sparkles with insight, clarity and intellectual brilliance. But does it make an unchallengeable case for the master's return? And is our resort to government spending and deficit finance a validation of Keynes? The answers depend on the diagnosis and what is meant by Keynesianism. The definition is by no means clear-cut.
Skidelsky runs through what Keynes was not. He was not a socialist, nationaliser or much of a regulator. "He came not exactly to praise capitalism, but certainly not to bury it". He was not an apostle of budget deficits, believing budgets should normally be balanced. He was not a tax-and-spend fanatic, nor did he believe unemployment was caused by a failure of demand.
He was not an inflationist. And, though liberal on trade, he was not totally opposed to protectionism. But he has been invoked as defence of most these positions. Heaven protect the master from his disciples.
So what did he believe? And what is useful about his theories? He believed the market, left to itself, was subject to slumps and there was a continuous role for government in ensuring these did not happen. To that extent, Keynes has surely never been out of fashion, still less "dead". The paradox in fact is rather how, with a mixed economy and a far bigger role for government than Keynes envisaged, we have suffered a financial and economic shock on such a scale as to threaten a second Great Depression.
Was the financial crisis the result of market excess and the failure of market practitioners to properly understand risk? Certainly. But was it also the result of government and regulatory failure? Those, too.
The policy debate now is less about how governments should respond in the macro-economic sphere than how to avoid excessive risk-taking by bankers on a micro-level. Keynes did not have much to say on whether investment banking should be split from retail, or how to regulate bankers' bonuses or how big banks should be allowed to become.
Nor is there much to guide us on the role of the risk-taking entrepreneur in turning the wheel of the business cycle on from slump - a role which the economist Joseph Schumpeter understood well and which makes him the more relevant economist for the uphill climb we now face. Skidelsky is at his best in dissecting the failure of economics and his advocacy of a broader economics degree which embraces economic history. But Schumpeter should rank equal to Keynes in any new syllabus
1 quote from his new york times column
A Masterful Explananation of the Master February 6, 2010 Robert Yerex (Mt Hood, Oregon) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I am a practicing economist in the private sector with 25 years of experience. I have likely read 200 books on economics and related areas. This is one of the best I've read. Not a technical book by any means, but a lucid and concise description of the Keynsian approach.
contribution of Keynes January 30, 2010 Martin T. Pond there were some sections that were difficult for me but the historical review was excellent.
excellent December 25, 2009 Bernard G. Krohn (bellflower, CA United States) Clear writing. Valuable information. Presents important aspects of Keynes' work that is not often cited.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 19
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |